For this reason, at any rate, I am inclined to see In Defense of Miraclesas more of a positive case for miracles than a rebuttal of any given non-theist or anti-miraculous position. But the problem with this book is that anyone who is already well-read in apologetics will find much in this volume that is repetitive. Craig's item on the empty tomb adds nothing new to his previous works; Moreland's essay on the resurrection appearances likewise. (It seems even more appropriate, in this light, that the collection includes an essay by Hume!)

The prospective purchaser of this work, then, must decide whether what is left that is unique is worth the price. If you have no further material on miracles, it is worth the price, perhaps in tandem with C. S. Lewis' book on the subject. But if your collection is already well-stocked, you won't gain anything by adding this to it. Case studies of the incarnation, fulfilled prophecy, etc. are all well and good, but if you wish to do some serious apologetics on these subjects, we suggest that you look elsewhere for more detailed studies dedicated solely to their issues.