|
If you think Barbara Thiering is loony, you haven't yet seen The Hiram Key. I can't offer any opinions on what is says about Freemasonry (based on Amazon reviews, some Masons think they're right; those who sound more intelligent think that Lomas and Knight haven't got a clue), but what they say about the Bible certainly isn't worth a hill of beans -- and I suggest that that tells us enough about these writers' capabilities as a whole.
Written by an advertising and graphic design marketing specialist and an electrical engineer (who needed the help of a kidney specialist), The Hiram Key is what you think it is -- a speculative conspiracy piece that claims that Christianity is a fraud, and that Masonry is at the root of the truth. As a research specialist, I found this book painful: Documentation is practically non-existent, and that's enough for me to dismiss this work completely and justifiably out of hand. Key claims about matters of history (especially with reference to claimed travels of the Knights Templar) are made with nary a footnote; the claims are merely asserted as though they were common, indisputable knowledge -- no works are cited from respected medieval historians, classicists, or anyone whose work is germane to the topic. What few notes are offered do not even give page numbers; anyone seeking to cross-check this work will have a long travail ahead of them. (I would suggest that the authors do not want anyone checking their claims, because they are either bogus or else speculation being paraded as fact.)
What things I am able to check, or have in the past, show these two to be complete incompetents: Claims that Mithra and Dionysus were sources for the story of Jesus; the claim that Nazareth did not exist in the first century (it is said that there are no records referring to Nazareth at the time, and this is said to be "a unique situation as the Romans kept excellent records throughout their empire" -- what "Roman records" that are still extant that should have mentioned Nazareth is not mentioned); use of Eisenman, Allegro, and Baigent and Leigh as authoritative sources; and equation of the Qumranites with the Jerusalem church (and with the Freemasons to boot! -- groups are equated with the Freemasons on the basis that they teach "truth, righteousness, and humility" like the Freemasons do -- I guess Confucius was also one of that bunch!). In short, The Hiram Key is yet another example of what happens when amateurs get their heads together: You hear a large and hollow clunk. I challenge anyone who thinks this book worthwhile to defend it to me with documentation.