|
|
Charles Templetons
Farewell To God |
|
Page Contents: |
|
|
|
|
Summary
Full Review Below |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book Reviewed | Our Rating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cosmic Bellyaching |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Publisher Commentary: Not available. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bookshop Summary: Yet another apostate cries into his towel because he doesn't understand what's going on. Intellectually lightweight, and full of issues the mature Christian has already dealt with. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
A review of Charles Templeton's Farewell To God by |
||
|
| Our review of this book is most timely today; it took me until now to get it because it was too new to receive via interlibrary loan, and I had to buy it with some of the funds donated to Tekton. Timely, though, because in Lee Strobel's latest effort, The Case for Faith , he begins by recounting a (revealing!) conversation he had with Templeton, which inspired Strobel to write his latest book in which he tackles (with proficiency, although you'll want to check Glenn Miller's articles if you need more detail) some of the very objections Templeton raises.Not that Templeton is much to pay attention to in the first place. This former cohort of Billy Graham turned apostate spends the overwhelming portion of this book a) listing "arguments by outrage" b) simply recounting something recorded in the Bible and merely commenting, in effect, "What intelligent person would believe this nonsense?" as if it were obviously nonsense. Critical analysis is in short supply; critical thinking more so; hard research -- well, devise a superlative yourself. Even though Templeton says that he attended Princeton Theological Seminary, his arguments are overall on the level of the Gumball School of Biblical Criticism. Templeton calls himself an agnostic, regarding both theism and atheism as unverifiable assertions of faith (though don't expect any sort of analysis of the traditional arguments: cosmological, ontological, moral, etc.). His analysis of religious belief is that you believe a religion merely because you were raised to -- "Is it credible that, had you been born in Asia or Afghanistan...or elsewhere, you would believe what you do today?"(23) Perhaps not, but what has this to do with anything? If I had been born in Cuba, I would have been brought up believing in Marxism; of what relevance is that to whether or not Marxism is true? But to say any one religion is right, we are told, is "insufferable presumption."(27) This is better, we are to suppose, than an insufferable assumption that there couldn't ever be a right religion...as if merely listing them proves something other than the sheer hyper-inventiveness of men. (It is said to be "common sense" [28] that the Creator would reveal himself worldwide, not only to "as tiny group of Mediterranean people" -- to which we reply, "Romans 1-2.") The preponderance of Templeton's book is a broad commentary on the Bible with little more than the usual mucking about we have seen from such quarters: Argument by outrage, argument by incredulity, there are 2 creation accounts in Genesis, "I'm grown up now and you're not," ancient people were too stupid or unsophisticated to do this or that, Yahweh is a meanie and why did he require such silly laws (hint: it was a priestly-control thing!), the gospels are pseudonymous and full of contradictions, miracles are impossible, what was Jesus doing before he was born (Charlie, didn't you learn about Wisdom theology while at Princeton?!?), the morals in the Bible are outdated because they don't stop people from breaking them (They never did! What moral code in history ever has?!?); the Trinity doesn't make sense; Jepthah's daughter, etc etc etc etc etc...all of this might be worth some respect if Templeton had any inkling of what modern evangelical and Biblical scholarship has to offer, but you won't find as much as a footnote in this book. Temlpeton is still hanging on to the likes of Schillebeeckx when Schillebeeckx hasn't been relevant for decades. The book closes with a series of the usual "boo hoo" questions, such as, "When an earthquake in Turkey buries thousands alive, when a typhoon drowns 150,000 Pakistanis over a weekend, when a drought in Somalia kills thousands of men, woman and children by starvation, why does a loving God not do something to help the helpless?" [193] God did do something -- He gave us the sense not to build our homes in earthquake- or typhoon-prone areas, or to make earthquake-resistant designs for buildings or create flood-prevention/control devices; He gave us the ability to grow more than enough food to feed people when drought strikes, but gosh darn it, most of us are just too stupid or involved in our own sinful, petty concerns to get off our duffs and take the needed steps. You think those Somalians are starving for lack of food? There's plenty of food aid coming their way -- but it's being used by corrupt leaders to buy limousines, and we aren't doing a thing about it. Templeton thinks that it's just the lack of rain that's the problem; he needs rather a broader view than the pictures he sees on the nightly news...and that's really the problem he, and many critics of Christianity, have always had. They are too selfish and self-centered to think of anything beyond their immediate desires and sensations...and isn't that a familiar problem? "Eat this fruit -- you'll be as the gods!" We recommend Farewell to God as a perfect "know thy enemy" book for the thinking Christian who wants to be able to defend their faith. It's not worth much otherwise. |