Apologetics Ministries
[Apologetics Encyclopedia of Bible Verses -- get your answers here! Look up by person's name, Scripture cite, or keyword search]
[What's New!]
[Book Reviews and Bookstore]
[Donate to the Ministry]
[Challenge to Critics]
[Mission Statement]
[Contact Us]
[Why Critics of the Bible Do Not Deserve Benefit of the Doubt]

[Can Prayer Get Us Anything?]

Search
PicoSearch
Support Us

CrossDaily.com
Awesome
Christian
Sites
Click Here
Vote For
This Site

Christian Top Sites
Christian Top Sites

Print out flyers for your church or school.

Tekton Logo vertical
Get the entire Tekton site on CD or zipfile. Get a stripped-down copy of this page.

Who Ya Gonna Call?

Is There A Righteous Man Who Can Pray?
Eric Vestrup


James 5:16 The prayer of a righteous man avails much...
Rom 3:10 There is no one righteous, not even one.

"Hey, Holding, this is a fun one! Who's gonna pray that James 5:16 prayer?!? Was he talkin' to nobody?!"

The answer is clear when the contexts of these statements are considered. In the Romans passage, St Paul is reaching the climax of his argument in chapters 1-3, that man on his own is not righteous before God, that Jew and non-Jew alike are not worthy on the basis of their works and merits to be justified before God. In this sense St Paul says that nobody is righteous. Yet Paul goes on to show that through faith in Jesus Christ, God-Incarnate, we are justified and therefore righteous in God's eyes. That is the glorious theme that pervades the epistle to Rome.

In the James passage, the context indicates that the man making the prayer is indeed justified and in the Church, that is, he is righteous -- justified in God's sight. St James in 5:7 refers to the readers as adelphoi , brothers in the faith. These addressees are indeed righteous through faith in Christ, hence St James is justified with his comment in 5:16. Yet at the same time, on their own merits alone [a la Romans 1-3] the addressees are not righteous. We see that there is absolutely no case for a contradiction here. We do see that once again context and actually trying to understand the text seems to escape skeptics.


Go Home!